|
| |
Ecosystem Sustainability Framework
for County Analysis
Updated
05/25/2005
The Ecosystem Sustainability Framework for County Analysis project
highlights the economic and environmental health of agricultural
counties within the same MLRA, using easily available data. It allows
NRCS to better target workloads and programs to these areas. This method
is patterned after the sustainability model used by Gomez et al., 1996.
The model assumes an agricultural system is sustainable if it meets the
needs of the farmer, and conserves the natural resources. Indicators are
selected for each of the concerns, and threshold levels of
sustainability are established. The threshold for an indicator is either
an average for the entire data set or another acceptable minimum value.
A score of one or higher indicates that the system is sustainable.
Systems can also be compared at the indicator level for individual
resource concerns.
- Summary - Ecosystem Sustainability Framework for County Analysis
(Decision-Aid Tools for Natural Resource Analysis)
This Document Requires
Adobe Acrobat
indicat.pdf
(205 KB)
- MS Word Summary (Report on Adopting the Gomez Ecosystem
Indicators)
This Document Requires
Microsoft Word
rprt_adpt_gmzec.doc
(1061 KB)
- Measuring the Sustainability of Ag. Systems at the Farm Level
1996 by Dr. Gomez, Kelly, and Syers
This Document Requires
Adobe Acrobat
gomez.pdf
(1435 KB)
- SWCS PowerPoint Presentation
This Document Requires
Microsoft PowerPoint
swcs_presentatn.ppt
(430 KB)
- State of the Land Conference Poster
This Document Requires
Microsoft PowerPoint
swcs_poster.ppt
(589 KB)
- Detail Results per Indicator
This Document Requires
Microsoft Word
gomez5.doc
(495 KB)
- List of Measure, Summary Excel Spreadsheet
This Document Requires
Microsoft Excel
list_of_measure.xls
(406 KB)
- Access database with example queries
This Document Requires
Microsoft Access
gomez105.mdb
(8.6 MB)
- NRCS Economics & Analysis Site
This study shows methods of obtaining indicators for one Major Land
Resource Area (MLRA), selecting the best combination of economic and
environmental indicators, and developing indices for economic and
environmental sustainability. This method is based on a sustainability
model used in the Philippines. Twenty-nine counties within MLRA 105 in
SW-WI, NR-IA, SE-MN and NW-IL were studied initially. A second phase
works with a North and South Carolina watershed, and a third phase is
looking at soil quality nationwide using primarily NRI data. The
indicators tested were derived from common nationally available
databases: Natural Resources Inventory (NRI), Agricultural Census,
National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) Crop Production
Statistics, and the Conservation Tillage Information Center (CTIC)
Tillage Survey, soils data, and EPIC model output. Indicators on: yield,
yield trends, net cash return/acre, long-term change in land values, %
farms with net losses, % cropland acres eroding over T, average cropland
and non cropland erosion (separate measures), % tree cover, conservation
tillage, and crop rotation were successful indicators. Indicators on:
net cash return per farm, farm tenure, yield variance, total acres
eroding over T, non-cropland acres eroding over T, and average cropland
erosion were determined not to be useful indicators in MLRA 105. Results
on these economic and environmental indexes show minor correlation
between long-term economic and environmental performance.
Key Words: sustainability indicators, Gomez, workload analysis, MLRA
105, economics, soil quality, social concerns.
< Back to ...
| |
|